Failure of Bush Part two.

Apparently Condi Rice thinks we will all be thanking this President for all the great stuff he has done. Like the 4000 plus dead in the useless and needless Iraq war, suspending habeus corpus, torture, and the Katrina disaster, and the failed economy, and the great big 'no strings' bailout, and the poor standing of the US in the world. I guess I could go on but what's the point. This is the latest story, and it is from someone who was probably the most incompetent National Security Director in our history. But that goes hand in hand with what is most assuredly the worst President too. For that matter she has not been the greatest Secretary of State either. There is so much that could be said about the incompetence of this administration. But I am curious why these folks feel the need to defend this dude now that his failure is coming to a close. If the President has done such a fantastic job why does he need defending or explaining or anything? Should it be self explanatory? I think so.

Mrs Bush Says husbands presidency not a failure....

And if you believe that I got a bridge to sell you chummy. This story is about an interview with the First Lady. In the interview she responds to those naysayers by stating how she doesn't need to respond to people who feel her husband is a failure. Say what? I guess George and Laura got together and compared noted cause she says that history will judge this Bozo too. Only she left out the Bozo part. Well I didn't watch the interview because it was on Fox and I don't watch Fox because Fox is the least credible of any newscast. Which says something about why Laura is hanging out on Fox eh? I think history will judge Bushie all right, it will judge him very very poorly.

Bush Administration accuses the NY times of 'Gross Negligence'.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah! Oh sorry I couldn't help myself. That title is just SO funny. Here is the story. Here is a quote, ""The Times' 'reporting' in this story amounted to finding selected quotes to support a story the reporters fully intended to write from the onset, while disregarding anything that didn't fit their point of view," White House Press Secretary Dana Perino said in an e-mailed statement" I wonder if she actually said that with a straight face. Of course she did! but she must have had to practice in the mirror for a while first. Substitute 'The Times' with the Bush Administration and 'a story' with the Iraq War and whattaya got? Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Sorry there I go again. Whew! Okay after you finish reading that story you will have read how the Bush Administration apparently pushed for additional regulation for the financial markets. Now realize this; The administration came to power in 2000 with what could be called at least questionable support. But Mr. Uniter not a Divider didn't seek this opportunity to mend fences, no sir! He took a majority of Republicans in both house and went to town creating what is undoubtedly the most ideological and divided U.S. policy in history. The Administration swaggered, name-called, bullied, spyed on, tortured and waged war upon anyone who they saw fit. Is it any surprise that when finally, in the winding down of his horrible Administration, that no one wants to play ball with him even when his legislation might make sense? If I was a Congressman I would have told the Shrub to get bent too. I certainly wouldn't wanted to have been seen as cooperating with him. We saw how that worked out for McCain, eh? So now the Times reports that the Emperor has no clothes and that the laissez faire policies of the last eight years have been largly responsible for the economic disaster of today. I think we can all say, yeah right, sorry George but methinks you protest too much.

Impeach, Remove and Arrest!

The Bush administration continues to lie about what it did in the run up to the Iraq war. Claiming that bad intelligence is at fault for their decision. This is false and they know it. They claim that our allies agreed that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, this is also not true.
Now they are squawking about a editorial in the NY Times exposing these very untruths. Of course there are other little tidbits that point out the lies and manipulation of the Bush Administration. There is this from 2003. Then there is Ms. Rice lying about weapons inspectors. A further article from Salon.com regarding Bush untruths and the Iraq war. Of course yet another article about the lack of WMD's.
What is wrong with us?! Are we so tired of all this that we just want it to go away and never think of it again? Why won't 'We The People' demand that congress Impeach this President? His acts are criminal. And his lack of empathy and uncaring attitude is immoral. I can only hope that someone somewhere along the line might actually grow a backbone and pursue charges and indictments against this administration. Oh but the surge is working! We have 'success' in Iraq! Oh get real! the 'surge' took place in 2007, fully four years after the war started! After it had already lasted longer than our involvement in the second World War! How is that a success?
Of course the current economic crisis is going to take all the attention from any potential charges that could possibly happen. Maybe once Obama does something constructive to lift us from the disaster that Bush has put us in we might consider Justice for the creep who is responsible for over 4000 soldiers deaths and untold innocent Iraqi deaths.

Are these people serious!?

Lately certain people in the Bush administration have been talking about how it was 'unfortunate' they had bad intelligence regarding Iraq. Like Ms. Rice... And of course the Idiot in Chief Mr. Bush. He regrets his 'intelligence failures'. Damn I think the only intelligence failures these guys had was between their ears. I don't claim to be a genius but I could had told them they wouldn't find WMD in Iraq. We were bombing the snot out of Saddam for the last 10 years prior to our attack. If he could reconstitute a WMD program during that then he is a better leader than they gave him credit for. Maybe that's why they had him snuffed. Gah! Bush Administration can't be over soon enough.

Bush Defends Capitalism.

Here is an interesting article. You got to love the continued praise and defense of unregulated supply side free markets eh? This guy is definitely not in our reality. HELLLLOOOO! We just had a basic meltdown of our financial system mainly because it wasn't regulated enough to prevent greedy bastards from taking advantage and this dude is recommending that we continue to keep it unregulated??!! What is he thinking with? It is obvious that he is not concerned with the average joe. You know the one? The average joe that Gov Palin always was referring to? Yeah that one. Well it becomes more and more apparent as we move into the future and the more one thinks about it at all that Socialism is the way to go. Socialism can guarantee access to things like healthcare, social security and education. There has to be a way to have a good mix of the marketplace for dispersal of goods and services and socialism for the guarantee of access. This has been know as Market Socialism. This link too. Mr. Bush your version of proto-fascist capitalism is hopefully soon to be at an end. Though I don't think that Obama is a socialist by any means I am hoping that he sets the stage for the regulation that our system needs.

Palin wouldn't oppose seeking high office again

Yeah right. If she were to actually get elected we would deserve the crap we get. I cannot believe she actually thinks that this is a possibility. Here's an interesting link. I got to say there are some interesting quotes in this story and if they are true, I assume so, then she must think we are stupid. Or she is stupid. Both are probably true. For example, she emphatically denies she was a drag on the ticket. Well Sarah, it doesn't really matter what you think in that regard since everyone else thinks you were a drag on the ticket. Apparently most of the voting public did too. I don't know about anyone else, but talking very publicly about your relationship and conversations with God makes me uncomfortable, just sayin eh? How about this quote? "I did not order the clothes. Did not ask for the clothes," Palin said. "I would have been happy to have worn my own clothes from Day One. But that is kind of an odd issue, an odd campaign issue as things were wrapping up there as to who ordered what and who demanded what."" Not really Sarah, when the campaign you are part of sells itself as a frugal user of the taxpayers money it is a very real issue. That much money on clothing matters. Check this link. Then go to the slideshow on Palin's campaign fashion. So tell me Sarah, who chose a Louis Vuitton bag for your seven year old? Finally she may want to do a little historical research in regard to republican administrations. Republican administrations always rack up more debt that Democratic ones. Check out this link. Good quotes from that article, "

For example, over the last 42 years, Democrats have been more fiscally responsible than Republicans:

• The biggest deficits occurred under Republican administrations; and
  
• The budget has been balanced five times, and always under Democratic presidents.

Under President Bush's watch, the budget has seen a historically unprecedented deterioration:

• There have been four straight years of a fiscal deterioration – the first times this has happened since WWII; and
  
• This is the first time in U.S. history that deficits have continued to grow this far into an economic recovery."

Ah you got to love the ability of the New Republican Conservative to be completely out of touch with reality.